Hi Stan,

On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 11:47 PM, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
>  > be much easier, switching to re2c promises a much faster lexer. Actually,
>  > without any specific re2c optimizations we already get around a 20% scanner
>
>  I think 20% faster is very cool.
>  However, as I understand re2c is not a standard tool found everywhere.
>  So what happens if you wanted to use it on some exotic system where re2c
>  is not readily available as manintainer-supported software? Also, flex
>  is available on Windows for example as part of cygwin, while I don't see
>  re2c there.

A quick note about this non problem. re2c works pretty well on windows
and they provide a .exe as far as I remember (much easier than flex
which requires cygwin or gnuwin32, even if both work :). Besides the
portability of re2c, we already use it in some extensions (if I
remember correctly) and nobody complained.

Cheers,
-- 
Pierre
http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to