On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > > > Personally I prefer going with a wiki, because I do not have much affection > > with CVS for these kinds of documents (actually I do think that the > README's > > should be in CVS, which is why I worked with Hannes on creating the current > > php.net/reST interface). I have put this document up on my wiki [12], and I > > will keep it uptodate. > > I'd go for RFC in CVS/Rest, and the todo's in a wiki.
Limiting the RFC to existing php.net's member sound like a bad idea and create CVS accounts only for a RFC does not sound any better. I would rather use the wiki for the complete process. Once a RFC reached a "stable" status, we can add it to a RFC repository. VC are perfect for source codes and relatively static contents but nor for documents edition like what we need for RFC, todos or other similar documents (no source code). Cheers, -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
