Hi Marcus, Hi Troels, > The biggest issue I see is finding a syntax everyone likes. Well, lets try some variations.
> Since renaming happens in a php array like > style I would prefer to have that approach apply for ignoring methods as > well. The way to do that imo is 'method=>false' or 'method=>NULL' which both > should be obvious to PHP programmers that heard about Traits. At first I'll have to make this clear. Aliasing != renaming. It is not renaming operation. Aliasing will give you an additional name for a method body. By example: trait Foo { public function foo() {echo 'foo';} } class FooFoo { use Foo { bar => foo } } This will eventually result in the following class at runtime: class FooFoo { /* RUNTIME */ public function foo() { echo 'foo';} public function bar() { echo 'foo';} } My idea behind this notation was the key => value thing use Trait { additionalMethodName => method } but may be we should use a keyword here which will be more clear. Troels ask for a separation of aliases and exclusions. Here are some notation proposals: [1] Explicit Except/Without List use Trait except foo1, foo2 { bar => foo1 } the keyword except could may be replaced by exceptfor or without if it fits better. [2a] ! is not readable --> except use Trait { except foo1, foo2; bar => foo1 } [2b] ! is not readable --> without use Trait { without foo1; without foo2; bar => foo1; } [Aa] Aliasing is not obvious use Trait { bar is foo1; //aliasMethod is method } [Ab] Aliasing is not obvious use Trait { bar from foo1; //aliasMethod from method } I'm not sure about Aa and Ab because they do not read well in my opinion. What do you think? -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php