On Feb 13, 2008 3:08 AM, Felipe Pena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Em Qua, 2008-02-13 às 01:31 +0100, Pierre Joye escreveu: > > Hi! > > > > On Feb 13, 2008 1:04 AM, Felipe Pena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I made a patch for 5_3 where all functions in ext/standard/math.c use > > > the new parameter parsing. (As was done in HEAD) > > > > I think it got lost between you and the list :) > > > > > If anyone think it good, let me know, and then i'll commit it. > > > > > > Several tests break with the patch. Hence, i'll fix them also, if > > > agreed. :) > > > > How do they fail? I worry a bit about BC here. > > There are two cases. > > In most part of it: > 003+ Warning: acos() expects exactly 1 parameter, 2 given ... > 003- Warning: Wrong parameter count for acos() ...
Ok, any branch. > And breaking BC: > 010+ > 011+ Warning: acos() expects parameter 1 to be double, string given ... > 012+ NULL > 010- float(1.570796327) > 014+ > 015+ Notice: A non well formed numeric value encountered ... I tend to think to do not break such things in 5.x. But 5.3 sounds like a good opportunity to add a notice about the bad inputs. I can't test the patch right now but does it change the result or only raises a notice? Cheers, -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
