On Feb 6, 2008 2:13 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Brown wrote:
> > On Feb 5, 2008 3:26 PM, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Feb 5, 2008 3:23 PM, Pierre Joye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> It seems that there is voices in favor of keeping the GPC related
> >>> functions in HEAD/php6 but returning always FALSE.
> >> Personally....
> >>
> >> XX
> >
> > VOTE CHANGED
> >
> > -1
> >
> > After a quick off-list discussion with Hannes (gotta' love Gmail
> > chat), I realized that I forgot to consider backwards-compatibility.
>
> I think a lot of people miss the point of these particular functions.
> This isn't about whether to keep magic quotes or not, it is whether to
> keep the function that tells you whether magic quote mangling is
> enabled. There is a lot of code out there that checks to see if this
> feature is on, and deals with that case. Having this function that
> simply tells the code to take the other path will allow it to work.
> This is not about restoring the magic quotes feature at all.
Exactly.
The problem is that if the function is removed then we are breaking
scripts for those few that actually check for MQ and deal with them.
The scripts by uneducated users that do not check for MQ will continue
to work as if nothing happened. However, by removing these functions
we are breaking all the scripts by the educated users who are
following best practices.
Furthermore, none of the MQ functions are even marked as depreciated yet.
What exactly is the gain in removing them completely?
All I'm asking is to keep PHP_FUNCTION(get_magic_quotes_gpc) { RETURN_FALSE; }
-Hannes
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
