Hi,
Guys, there is really no point to argue about aesthetic or taste. Make
your point by using +1/-1 and that's it. As said, the trolls quota has
been used already.
Thanks for my bandwidth,
On Jan 11, 2008 12:12 PM, Max Antonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Johannes Schlüter writes:
>
> >
> > The last line is exactly why I won't like such a syntax. Just consider
> > the a bit worse call like
> > foo([1, $a[2]]);
> > I might even construct worse examples,
>
> is this a good-readable code?
> foo (array('a'=2,'b'=>array('x'=>5,'c'=>array(1,4,2)),'n'=>$bar[4]));
> what difference in?
> foo(['a'=2,'b'=>['x'=>5,'c'=>[1,4,2]],'n'=>$bar[4]]);
>
> I think - it will be good readable in large projects too.
>
> Please look to code of ExtJS JavaScript Library - this syntax native in
> javascript and it very usable
>
> (excuse me for my English)
>
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
--
Pierre
http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
