I'm not gonna start the discussion about making this list read-only again, maybe
it's just enough that Stas is not allowed to post? :D
Anyway, who dropped the word "OPTIONAL" from the subject? I think that was quite
essential part of this whole debate? As I'm +1 for OPTIONAL scalar-type hinting.
It would have saved me some hours of debugging to find a very stupid mistake I
made this week at work..
--Jani
Andi Gutmans kirjoitti:
At least I suggest that people limit themselves to max 1 email per hour
(incl. Stas & Sam) - preferably 2-3 per day. Just take a 1-2 hour
breather after you've sent an email and then read the whole thread that
comes back and answer multiple arguments in one email.
Seriously, the person answering most often and quickest is not going to
win this debate :)
Andi
-----Original Message-----
From: Lukas Kahwe Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 12:19 PM
To: Robert Cummings
Cc: Stas Malyshev; Sam Barrow; Pierre; internals Mailing List
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] type hinting
Hi,
Ok here is a genious idea. We call for a 24 hour period of silence on
this topic. All people eager to post just re-read all previous emails
and once the 24 hours are over you know what has been said already so
that you can actually make sure to say something novel. What would be
even better is if you could summarize the discussion (both sides) and
put this up on a website. If you want you can use my release
management wiki.
Thanks for 24 hours of peace on this topic ..
regards,
Lukas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
