Same here. On 10/2/07, Ford, Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 02 October 2007 07:16, Sebastian Nohn wrote: > > > Andi Gutmans wrote: > > > Hi Johannes, > > > Our preference would be to stick to "import" because I > > think the perception many will have of "use" is that it also > > includes files (just based on some other languages). > > I don't know much about "other languages", but purely in terms of English I > would expect "use" to work with something that's already lying around ready > to be used, whereas "import" would go and fetch something from somewhere else > and make it ready to be used in the current context. In other words, I would > probably expect "import" to potentially have an implied "include", and "use" > not to. > > But then, in the global polyglot marketplace, this argument may not have much > force!! ;) > > Cheers! > > Mike > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Mike Ford, Electronic Information Services Adviser, > JG125, The Headingley Library, > James Graham Building, Leeds Metropolitan University, > Headingley Campus, LEEDS, LS6 3QS, United Kingdom > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Tel: +44 113 812 4730 Fax: +44 113 812 3211 > > > To view the terms under which this email is distributed, please go to > http://disclaimer.leedsmet.ac.uk/email.htm > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >
Giedrius -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
