And if you think that this breaks something..well, it doesn't.
The old libphp4.so, and libphp5.so aren't changing with this, are
they? :D
Right, but the World Order [tm] does =)
Looking at how Unix shared libs are named customary, there's a
considerable part of those bearing major versions in their names
(libc6.so, libxml2.so, etc.). So for .so it's probably OK to stay with
version. However, that doesn't mean, for example, project files should
stay with version - i.e. that there should be files in the repository
named php5.* or libphp5.*. Unless of course there's some limitation from
the autolools/libtool side. I think windows doesn't have any problem
with that anyway, so we could weed out all those php5.dsp etc.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
