static function getTableName() { return 'PRODS'; }
What a great idea! You can just do:
$tableName = $this->getTableName();
...from within the base class. No need for static:: or super:: keywords
anymore... It may be not as elegant as having a special keyword for
it... (Or if this is the intended solution with PHP)... But, for now,
this approach would partially make my code a bit more elegant... Thanx!
Now, all I would still like to be able to do is:
$className::getTableName();
Jochem Maas wrote:
Richard Lynch wrote:
Maybe I'm just confused (well, I'm always confused...) but if a Class
has multiple children, how the heck would PHP know which child:: to
call?...
the use of the name 'child' is very confusing, I would prefer 'super' or
'static' ...
regardless the concept is actually quite simple:
interface DOInfo {
static function getTableName();
}
abstract class DataObject implements DOInfo {
static function findRange() {
$table = super::getTableName();
return $foo; // $foo is a collection of whatever (e.g. Product
objects)
}
static function getTableName() {
throw new Exception('be a dear and implement '.__METHOD__.' in
your subclass'); }
}
class Product extends DataObject {
static function getTableName() { return 'PRODS'; }
}
$products = Product::findRange();
excuse me if I've just committed a grave sin against the OO Codex in writing
something
that either isn't 'correct' or is syntactically incorrect according to the
current
state of php - hopefully the idea is clear anyway.
- Ken
--
It looked like something resembling white marble, which was
probably what it was: something resembling white marble.
-- Douglas Adams, "The Hitchhikers Guide to the
Galaxy"
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
