I think phar is a nice idea but honestly haven't had enough bandwidth to
check it out in more detail. Has there been some thorough analysis on
the performance impact of it and whether this is the optimal recommended
way for our users to distribute apps? The idea is actually very
interesting but we should be pretty certain we're doing the right thing
before we distribute it. We can spend some time looking at it in more
detail.
Btw, it seems to me that because of the way Apache works for most of our
users it actually won't be that useful and just act like a .tar archieve
which needs to be extracted. This is unless the user implements some
kind of front controller. It would really be nice if we have the 99%
common Apache application use-case figured out and docuemnted before we
put our PHP dev team weight behind it. Or am I completely missing some
magic here?

Re: debug info for files. I wouldn't like to see that in non-debug runs.
It could be optional at runtime if you want.

Andi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcus Boerger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 12:44 PM
> To: Stas Malyshev
> Cc: Edin Kadribasic; internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Starting 5.3
> 
> Hello Stanislav,
> 
> - you don't need a tool - well php - but hey you probbaly 
> have that tool
> - you can run phar archives out of the box - untouched
> - you can extract phar archives and run them - still untouched
> - you can provide phar archives that do not require a phar extension
> 
> To your question "is phar so important that everybody needs 
> it in the main source." I think the above means it should.
> 
> best regards
> marcus
> 
> Friday, May 4, 2007, 9:36:22 PM, you wrote:
> 
> >> obsolete set of tools (autoconf-2.13, etc.). Having Phar 
> in the main 
> >> distro will open up a whole new way to distribute PHP applications 
> >> which would be a great advantage. The current system of 
> distributing 
> >> a bunch of PHP files has some shortcomings.
> 
> > I'm personally not sure phar is that great way of 
> distributing apps - 
> > it's yet another format not supported by standard tools and I don't 
> > really see much of an advantage to using it versus just making a 
> > package with any of the existing package formats and I see 
> a number of 
> > disadvantages - non-standard format, hard to work with 
> packed scripts 
> > with available filesystem tools, etc. But that's my opinion and I 
> > fully expect some people to hold exactly the opposite opinion. The 
> > question is however is phar so important that everybody 
> needs it in the main source?
> > --
> > Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
> > http://www.zend.com/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Best regards,
>  Marcus
> 
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To 
> unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> 
> 

--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to