On 05/04/2007 09:32 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote:
I really don't think we need phar in core, certainly not enabled by default. If someone can make a good case for including it, I'd love to hear it.

Easier distributing/deployment of stuff and phar even allows to use the
packed files as is from within the package or unpacked without any
change. We use phar already for pear. Having the extension version that
allows the mentioned untouched unpacking feature would help a lot of
people.

What's the problem with having it in PECL?
I'm sure everybody interested in it can get it working in no more than 10 
seconds using `pecl install phar`.

--
Wbr, Antony Dovgal

--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to