On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Marcus Boerger wrote: > Hello Antony, > > Thursday, April 26, 2007, 12:05:07 AM, you wrote: > > > On 04/26/2007 01:45 AM, Gwynne Raskind wrote: > >> Hmm... For some reason I missed that in my searches. That being > >> said, the existence of one doesn't preclude the writing of another > >> :). Also, it seems the official documentation in the PHP manual > >> could use some serious updating, which I would also be willing to > >> undertake if people think that would be more useful. > > > Actually I've been recently thinking of adding some kind of > > documentation to the sources. Surely this is not supposed to be > > something similar to php.net/manual/, just short descriptions of > > functions and their arguments, which can be used as a start for the > > "real" documentation. But I wasn't lucky enough to find a utility > > that would fit my (personal) needs. > > > Doxygen (which seems to be uses by the majority of F/OSS projects) > > generates completely unreadable docs. Every time I look into ICU > > docs (generated by Doxygen) I get lost for 10 minutes trying to find > > a function _by name_. In the same time, other tools do not provide > > such a wide range of output formats as available in Doxygen. > > Hu? It has a search option if you want. And it has alphabetical lists > for functions, consts, classes, files, modules, whatever. And if that > is not enough we could take it's xml output to feed a database and > provide a fulltext search on that.
That doesn't make the docs more readable though... Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
