That would be very handy. As I code frequently JavaScript and ActionScript, I will use this feature with pleasure. +2 for me :D The array(), especially for more-than-1 dimensional arrays is very cumbersome.
Best Regards, Ivailo Karamanolev On Monday, February 5, 2007, 12:53:44 PM, LAUPRETRE François<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> From: Christian Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> What's also beautiful about [] IMHO is the symmetry of the syntax, >> list() and array() are asymmetrical which I always found inferior. > Agree. +1 for me, especially for this reason, even after reading Greg's > examples :) IMO, it is > more important to provide an elegant alternative to list() than a new syntax > for array(). >> >> >> - func('foo' => $foo, 'bar' => $bar, ...) equivalent to >> >> func(array('foo' => $foo, 'bar' => $bar, ...) > Argh! Reading such a line, I think of named parameters, not an array. Ugly, > confusing. -1 for > me. Definitely. > May I add that, as I regularly write multi-layer arrays as SOAP return > values, I personnaly > like this proposed syntax. > Francois > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
