Hello Sebastian,
the best ones unfortunatley are GPL and thus not acceptable. I once played with case insensitive hashes. They worked very much faster - but they had more conflicts. If we were about intel processors my experience is that string functions can be optimized at assembler level very much. For instance i once ago increased string up/downcase by 32 times using a table based xlat approach that was reading the string in chunks of 4 byte. Maybe itcould be interesting to see whether we could come up with a version that takes 4 byte or 8 byte chunks depending on the cpu. And eventually we have hash codes in 64 bit machines be 8 bytes long as well. best regards marcus Friday, November 10, 2006, 7:20:59 PM, you wrote: > Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: >> As your key size increases the slower the key hash generation process >> becomes, if you look at the PHP's hash key generation code you'll see >> that it works best for 8 or less chars, anything longer and the >> performance starts to drop. > It's been a long time since I studied hashes: are there no hashing > algorithms that perform better with more than 8 characters? > -- > Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ > GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B 6867 C514 B85B 5D69 Best regards, Marcus -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php