Yep I agree. I thought the idea was to go to filter_* which has been our standard for extensions. I'm sure we can find good names for the functions in this way.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Ilia Alshanetsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Ilia Alshanetsky > Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 10:36 AM > To: Dan Scott > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; internals@lists.php.net; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] ext/filter, Final API proposal > > > On 16-Sep-06, at 1:28 PM, Dan Scott wrote: > > Agreed. input_id_filter() is shorter than > input_name_to_filter(), and > > input_list_filters() is the same length as input_filters_list(). > > Why not change the function prefixes to filter_*, which in > turn allows for MUCH shorter name, > Ex: input_list_filters -> filter_list() > > Ilia Alshanetsky > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To > unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
