Hello Pierre,

  if you cannot read stop blaming me. It was Robert and not Christian.
And then read carefully again. You might get the connection. If not i
am all sorry.

marcus

Wednesday, August 2, 2006, 12:41:40 PM, you wrote:

> On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 02:42:10 +0200
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marcus Boerger) wrote:

>> Hello Robert,
>> 
>> Wednesday, August 2, 2006, 2:32:27 AM, you wrote:
>> 
>> > To make a better language. Following all the sheep out there just
>> > makes for more fodder. Just because it's in the books, doesn't make
>> > it the best way. Innovation doesn't come by following the pack it
>> > almost always comes from changing the game.
>> 
>> This is a ridiculous accusation of my person directly - but thanks.
>> We chose a damn good set available yet working. And i invented for
>> example iterators in php, sorry it is only that. But it is far most
>> the best iterator implementation any language out there has. And i am
>> not paid for anything (like most of us) so sorry we cannot do it
>> better.

> It is a discussion where developers and users tell their opinion on a
> technical (or theoretical) topic. It is the second time in this thread
> that you jumped out of your big horse to say such things. It is
> pointless. The fact that you work on the iterators or whatever else
> does not make you right, not more than me or Christian.


>> Instead of argumenting like this you guys should start helping us.

> It is what I do, as much if not more as you do, and I second Robert's
> opinion. And I do not say that you are responsible for all PHP's recent
> troubles, only that I have the same *opinion* than him on this topic.

> -- Pierre




Best regards,
 Marcus

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to