Hello Pierre, if you cannot read stop blaming me. It was Robert and not Christian. And then read carefully again. You might get the connection. If not i am all sorry.
marcus Wednesday, August 2, 2006, 12:41:40 PM, you wrote: > On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 02:42:10 +0200 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marcus Boerger) wrote: >> Hello Robert, >> >> Wednesday, August 2, 2006, 2:32:27 AM, you wrote: >> >> > To make a better language. Following all the sheep out there just >> > makes for more fodder. Just because it's in the books, doesn't make >> > it the best way. Innovation doesn't come by following the pack it >> > almost always comes from changing the game. >> >> This is a ridiculous accusation of my person directly - but thanks. >> We chose a damn good set available yet working. And i invented for >> example iterators in php, sorry it is only that. But it is far most >> the best iterator implementation any language out there has. And i am >> not paid for anything (like most of us) so sorry we cannot do it >> better. > It is a discussion where developers and users tell their opinion on a > technical (or theoretical) topic. It is the second time in this thread > that you jumped out of your big horse to say such things. It is > pointless. The fact that you work on the iterators or whatever else > does not make you right, not more than me or Christian. >> Instead of argumenting like this you guys should start helping us. > It is what I do, as much if not more as you do, and I second Robert's > opinion. And I do not say that you are responsible for all PHP's recent > troubles, only that I have the same *opinion* than him on this topic. > -- Pierre Best regards, Marcus -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php