Shouldn't be necessary. As there are 2 different methods, they should be allowed different parameter signatures. If you want to extend a method but hide original implementation, you can't change the parameter signature. I'm on the opposite side of the fence to you it seems!
On 21/07/06, Soenke Ruempler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Derick Rethans <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Friday, July 21, 2006 11:31 AM: To be compatible, the only thing you have to do is adding standard values to derived methods' parameters: $ php -d"error_reporting=8191" -r 'class c{function f(){}} class d extends c{function f($a){}}'; Strict Standards: Declaration of d::f() should be compatible with that of c::f() in Command line code on line 2 $ php -d"error_reporting=8191" -r 'class c{function f(){}} class d extends c{function f($a = null){}}'; $ [no error] This behaviour makes sense to me. -soenke -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
-- ----- Richard Quadling Zend Certified Engineer : http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731 "Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!" -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
