Hello Andi, the question was how to implement this as a c ref is a pointer, in case of zval*'s it is a zval** but in php a ref is a zval with is_ref=1. If we go with php refs then we would convert all variables to refs. Now i wonder if we could chang the return type to be a c reference only, can we do that? And is it even wanted? Since if it were easily possible, why aren't we doing that everywhere? It would solve a bunch of issues...
best regards marcus Thursday, July 20, 2006, 7:40:37 AM, you wrote: > We were considering supporting a __getRef() method. You could implement > either or both of them and then the right thing would happen. > Dmitry, Marcus - Besides having to come to a decision about this, is there > any situation you guys discussed for which this would not work? > Thx. > Andi >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dmitry Stogov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 8:23 AM >> To: internals@lists.php.net >> Cc: Marcus Boerger; Andi Gutmans >> Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.2-dev "Cannot use array returned >> from foo::__get('bar') in write context" >> >> __get() never worked in write context proper. >> It just CAN NOT work proper, because __get() returns by value >> (zval*), but modification requires address (zval**). >> We have a lot of __get() related bugs because of this >> situation in bugs.php.net. >> >> Month ago Marcus disabled usage of __get() in write context >> and I am completely agree with him We cannot use E_STRICT for >> this error and then SIGSEGV. >> >> Thanks. Dmitry. >> >> >> >> >> Best regards, Marcus -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
