On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 07:23:41 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rasmus Lerdorf) wrote:

> I think we need to rename it.  php_date or _date or something.  I
> don't really care what the name is, but I think we are too late in
> the game to get the 'date' identifier.  The other functions enabled
> are fine and quite necessary actually.  Both
> timezone_abbreviations_list() and timezone_identifiers_list() are
> quite useful.


To be honest, we agreed only on date_sun_info and nothing else. It
was on line since weeks if not months.

That said, it makes no sense to rename it only to enable a dummy date
class and that's true for all new additions.

Before someone comes in and says that PEAR or any other projects don't
care about PHP5 and common names/prefix, please consider to read:

http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=419
and
http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=420

These processes take time and not only for pear.

Cheers,
--Pierre

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to