-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Gwynne wrote: > I'm new to this list, so I apologize if I'm out of line in commenting > here, but it's my opinion that the advantages offered by a __hash() > magic function would outweigh the inevitable complexity and issues > involved. I imagine that it would be a strict semantic: If the class of > the object being indexed into the array doesn't define a magic __hash() > function, it would be a warning or even fatal error; no attempt > would/should be made to calculate a hash based on anything other than > what the object is willing to call itself.
I would imagine that __hash() or whatever it is called would be defined on all objects and implemented internally in PHP, and would simply generate some internal hash that is unique for all objects. - -- Jasper Bryant-Greene General Manager Album Limited http://www.album.co.nz/ 0800 4 ALBUM [EMAIL PROTECTED] 021 708 334 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32) iD8DBQFEgglOFfAeHhDzT4gRA2JtAKC3rkHI6QGo5yYQyHBbuZzG068D6wCgqej3 QqtgAcCeC5qo8ja2oCB4aUw= =2C/T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
