I can't find any references to a discussion on this either.
This change was also on the list for 6 and has been completed, would that not be a better time to do this? -bok On 5/26/06, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Zeev, Thursday, May 25, 2006, 11:51:44 PM, you wrote: > At 23:44 25/05/2006, Marcus Boerger wrote: >>Hello Zeev, >> >>Thursday, May 25, 2006, 1:04:59 PM, you wrote: >> >> > At 21:29 23/05/2006, Marcus Boerger wrote: >> >>Hello Zeev, >> >> >> >>See here: http://oss.backendmedia.com/PhP52 >> >> 12. 4. Drop ZE1 compatibility Done (marcus) >> >> > (Sorry for the slow response, I'm traveling) >> >> > Yeah that's fine, but it was never discussed at all let alone decided >> > upon... IMHO it doesn't make sense to remove that in PHP 5.x - it's >> > not a great feature, but some people are using it, and we're not >> > gaining anything from making their lives more difficult. >> >> > Can you please revert this patch, and only remove it in PHP 6.0 >> as we agreed? >> >>No i cannot. And there was an open discussion. And you weren't intersted at >>that time. > As I said, can you point me to that open discussion? I found no > references to it of any sort. The first email that mentioned it is > from Ilia, listing a list of things for PHP 5.2, with this among > them. Just in case it's not clear, that does not constitute discussion :) What does, if you agree or anybody else in particular? We have put it on our todo and i acted on behalf of that. And for the same reson that i dropped E_STRICT from E_ALL i am not reverting that patch. Sorry but it has been the php way the silent acceptance. I would really like to change to a more formal way which is why i really really like stuff like the above mentioned site. Best regards, Marcus -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
-- Xnyo - http://xnyo.odynia.org/
