Hello Stanislav, Wednesday, May 17, 2006, 12:30:35 PM, you wrote:
JG>>> private readable $abc; JG>>> - doesn't make sense. JG>>> JG>>> protected readable $abc; JG>>> - sub-class can read, not write JG>>> - not visible outside class JG>>> JG>>> public readable $abc; JG>>> - sub-class can read, and write JG>>> - outside class can read, not write > For me such setup seems quite weird - why adding "readable" keyword to > "public $x" ort "protected $x" makes it read-only? It's not exactly what > word "readable" means - it means you can read, not you can not write. > I'd say adding "readable" means everybody could read it, while writing still Jason was referring to an initial idea of "readonly" that we obviously agree makes no sense. When experimenting with patches i then changed the thing to "readable" in name (syntax) and semantics. > restricted by access modifier, so readable private means only owner can > write, readable protected means owner and descendants can write and > readable public is just public. This would make more sense - if we decide > readable should be a modifier, of course. > -- > Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/ +972-3-6139665 ext.115 Best regards, Marcus -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
