Marcus Boerger wrote:
<offtopic>
Sorry i have to say that but PEAR is no argument here as still after
years of PHP 5 there is no PHP 5 compatible PEAR. Yet we are discussing
a PHP 5 version here.
PEAR is PHP5 compatible. But you probably meant E_STRICT compatible.
Yes, I agree that PEAR needs to become once again a place for features
missing in PHP and not a place for legacy code.
</offtopic>
Anyways I brought up PEAR more as an example of what our current
userbase looks like. Mostly doing PHP4 and where its PHP5 its often
written to also be compatible with PHP4. By increasing the burden on
keeping this "duality" we might get more people to make the jump which
might put enough pressure on hosters to finally break the chicken and
egg situation with PHP5.
regards,
Lukas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
