Brandon Fosdick wrote:
Pierre wrote:
You had a yes for this question (this is part of the CS), and my
answer was about your first question, sorry :)
Thanks. The CS says "should", and I've been reading webdav specs for the
last few days..."should" and "must" are different things in that world.
I was looking for something a little more definitive.
That, and being from the not-the-oldest part of the crowd, it gets a
little frustrating having to deal with older stuff, or stuff that seems
older. I work with people who still remember slide rules :) I guess I'm
getting a bit sensitized.
Is C++ allowed around here? too new? :)
There is nothing outdated about vim and Emacs. My guess would be that 4
out of 5 core and extension developers use either vim or Emacs. And
like Sara mentioned, these marks are also for the doc tools, so if you
don't include them, the automated documentation tools are not going to
be able to pull a skeleton documentation section out of your extension
and your extension's functions won't be included in the quick ref
function summary files that are generated every now and then.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
