Steph Fox wrote:

Perhaps there could be just the one hard rule. 'If it's possible to implement it as an extension, do so.' There'd be nothing to prevent co-opting essential functionality into the core, but also nothing preventing fly-by-night technologies from having support in PHP. The biggest problem there is that it doesn't give webhost users a fair crack because changing hosts means you risk losing a package or two; and the ability to write portable applications is affected in the same way. But this isn't about the language itself any more...

Actually there is a danger in making all too many different syntax enhancing extensions public:
Language fragmentation.

At some point some of these extensions might become incompatible with eachother. It just seems to me like a syntax adding extension is a different beast to handle than one that adds new syntax from system administrators/shared hosters perspective.

regards,
Lukas

--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to