I personally find working with numbers difficult, which is why I'm wholly in
support of this patch.
I doubt I'm the only PHP user with that issue, due to the 'ease of use' that
allows people with no history of computer science to write useful scripts
(for which, thank you all). But I wouldn't expect a great deal of sympathy
on that point from CS graduates.
nb I think implementing goto/equivalent itself is a fairly bad idea - I
appear to be in the minority on that issue. But I don't see any problem with
introducing labels, I just see it as a more user-friendly way of allowing
nested breaks.
Am I very wrong?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Steph Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "internals" <internals@lists.php.net>
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2006 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] True labelled breaks
I think that in 1997 when break/continue n where implemented it would have
been a nice idea, but at this stage except for being more elegant than
break/continue n it doesn't truly add anything substantial to PHP (and as
you already mentioned it's orthogonal to the goto discussion). I think
having more than 1 way of doing the same thing, in this case, might just
end up confusing people developing with PHP (i.e. the Perl way :)
Just for the record I am coming at this from an open mind. Dmitry did
spend time on this patch, etc...
I'd recommend to bed it once and for all.
At 09:16 AM 2/18/2006, Steph Fox wrote:
Guys and guyess,
Sara and Dmitry's patch to introduce labelled breaks was discussed on
internals@ ever-so-briefly at the beginning of December, but there was
never any decision made over it.
Given that practically everyone who survived the preceding GOTO discussion
seemed to think it was a good idea at the time, could you please re-visit
it, evaluate it, discuss it (as opposed to talking about GOTO, which is
unrelated) and either OK it or put it to bed for once and for all?
Relevant summary is at http://www.zend.com/zend/week/week265.php#Heading3
Relevant patch is at http://www.zend.com/zend/week/pat/index.php
And if it's worth anything, +1 from me.
- Steph
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
__________ NOD32 1.1380 (20060125) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
