On Jan 28, 2006, at 4:08 PM, Kevin Waterson wrote:
To give SplObjectStorage a better name. My best suggestion is
SplUniqueObjectContainer. There may be a better choice.
Why not just call it Betty.
Why not? "Betty" is only slightly more vague than "Storage." A vague
name is nobody's friend.
Here is a sitepoint thread where a use of SplObjectStorage is discussed.
http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=339769
I'm just trying to point out that the class may have a broader use than
the context in which it was conceived and that the name could better
reflect its function.
AFAIK, SplObjectStorage is targeted for PHP 6. I'm not suggesting
changing something that has been in PHP for half a decade. Is this not
the appropriate time and place to give feedback about API design
issues?
Best Regards,
Jeff
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
