At 06:15 PM 1/20/2006, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
I am all for the filter extension as well obviously, but I agree
there is a bit of cleanup needed and I have a bunch of things I'd
like to see in it, but none of them necessarily block adding it.
Not sure about the functionality, and I agree some of it can probably
way, but I would want to finalize the naming before so that we don't
have to change it and have another BC mode.
As far as promising it for 5.1.0? I don't recall that being the
case. It wasn't ready when we rolled the first 5.1.0 packages.
Yeah I don't remember that either but again, I'm all in favor, but
let's just iron out the naming and other feedback which is deemed as
critical (if it's just additional non-API affecting features, those
can always be added later on)
Andi
-Rasmus
Andi Gutmans wrote:
I've always been in favor of having ext/filter in standard PHP.
It's time we added some security supporting features.
Only thing I'd like to do before that is improve the naming
conventions a bit. Functions filter_* and I think the constant
naming like FL_* and FS_* is a bit confusing. But those are things
that can be finalized and changed within a day.
Andi
At 04:51 PM 1/20/2006, Jani Taskinen wrote:
I'm not against this extension. I'd just very much like to
see the filter extension finally in core as was promised
for 5.1.0 once upon the time..IIRC.
--Jani
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Andi Gutmans wrote:
JSON is actually useful for real-world apps and not only for
buzzword-compliance :)
At 02:02 PM 1/20/2006, Jani Taskinen wrote:
yet-another-must-have-because-it-is-sexy-and-buzzword-compliant
extension..
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php