ew
On 11/28/05, Bart de Boer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sorry if I say stupid stuff. My previous post actually was the first
> post I've ever made to a newsgroup! Please bare with me while I adjust
> to the etiquettes. :)
>
> Anyway. Somebody has probably already suggested this. But how about:
>
> namespace1}{Date::myfunction();
> namespace2}{Date::Otherfunction();
>
>
>
>
> Greg Beaver wrote:
> > Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> >
> >> OG>>BUT the discussion is not only about possibility but also about
> >> what you
> >> OG>>would like. The ":" for example would work if mandatory whitespace
> >> would
> >> OG>>be introduced for the ternary BUT this is very very bad.
> >>
> >> If my vote is counted (not that I asked for it :) then I vote against
> >> all funky syntax, present and future. :: is only thing that is obvious
> >> and somehow connected to the world of PHP as we know it now.
> >
> >
> > Agreed, I am only in favor of :: if it is technically possible.
> >
> > Greg
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
