Marcus Boerger schrieb:
> i honestly wouldn't have execpted things like ';;' or '**' from you.
First of all: Read the first thread! Anything is accepted as wish.
It doesn't matter if it can be realized since we want to get to know
what people like.
My thoughts (disregarding technical possibilities):
** Shouldn't this be a power operator like "^"?
And by the way: How could PHP get ten years old
without having a power operator?
;; Comments are comments are comments are comments.
> But it made me laugh. Anyway this whole thread is completley nonsense
> as long as noone that is participating has not the tinies clue - sorry.
Is this recursive? Don't YOU have the tiniest clue? I don't think so.
But then again, you aren't really participating. Some real answers would
help. For my part, I'd really like an answer to my question about the
possibility of changing operator precedence in the ternary. Is this
impossible to do? Doesn't the "?" already send the tokenizer into a "now
I'm reading a ternary mode"? Wouldn't this open a possibility to force
the usage of whitespace only when using namespaces without breaking
existing code?
OLLi
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
