On 11/26/05, David Zülke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If we rule out :::, it should be <- instead.
I'd hate to see it be <-, looks too much like ->. Foo<-bar<-Baz::getTest()->foo(); but I agree that ::: should be ruled out all together, its too similar to ::. I'd almost rather have %% over <-, and even that looks kinda messy. I think if I had to, I'd pick :>, although there still isn't any that stands out to me as "Hey, this is definately a good choice" -- --Robert Deaton
