> This rename would also give us a migration path where you could have a
> simple: class date extends date_ex { ... } wrapper which could then be
> removed when we have the final internal date class implementation.IMVHO this is a good idea. At least I greatly appreciate that it wouldn't break applications just for the sake of having a namespace for constants and "future proofing". > I don't think having this mostly empty date > class placeholder helps anybody right now. It seems to for some people, but for the majority of PHP application developers out there it does the exact opposite. Regards, Sebastian -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
