Hello Sean,

Wednesday, September 21, 2005, 4:54:31 PM, you wrote:

> Hello all,

> This crept up as the result of a bug report (not mine --
> http://bugs.php.net/34494), and a small discussion on IRC:

> Why does an E_STRICT get raised when extending a class, and altering the
> method's proto defaults? I understand why it would be thrown when
> adding/changing parameters, but why when simply changing $foo to $foo=1 ?

> Honest question -- I'm not trying to change the behavior, here. It
> doesn't seem "correct" to me, but I look forward to an explanation that
> I've simply overlooked.

> S


[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/src/PHP_5_1 $ php -r 'class T{function f($x){}} class U 
extends T{function f($x=2){}}'
make: `sapi/cli/php' is up to date.

Strict Standards: Declaration of U::f() should be compatible with that of 
T::f() in Command line code on line 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/src/PHP_5_1 $ php -r 'class T{function f($x=1){}} class 
U extends T{function f($x=2){}}'
make: `sapi/cli/php' is up to date.

The above shows php is correct here.

Best regards,
 Marcus

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to