On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Peter Brodersen wrote: > Comparing php bug reporting to mozilla and mysql (the latter being a > bit unfair comparison with professional workers) I think that mozilla > bogus bugs have better references (to dupes, etc.) and mysql bogus > bugs are even more polite in their template answers.
MySQL has real customers, we don't have that. That doesn't mean that any suggestions for better template answers are not appreciated. > Some of the stuff I see on bugs.php.net that I'm not too happy about > are "."-answers (maybe just to satisfy a requirement of some kind of > answer) and "This is not a bug"-templates several times in a > bug-thread. You know we actually added the requirement only if you bogus bugs to add a comment why. But there are quite a lot of bugs that should not have come in in the first place, and those are hapily answered with "." only. > I guess my only real suggestion is that some of the template-answers > could be better worded. Feel free to send a patch, and that was not meant as an attack. Derick -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
