Hello Andi, hello Zeev, MFH and change towards class constants is done. The only part being new inside SPL now is the ability of spl's autoload to work with non static loader methods. Do you think i should move that into 5.1 as well?
regards marcus Wednesday, September 14, 2005, 9:55:32 PM, you wrote: > I am sure I answered but I see Zeev has now (pretty much what I answered too > :) > At 07:39 AM 9/14/2005, Marcus Boerger wrote: >>Hello Zeev, >> >> i tried to get any feedback from You or andi regarding SPL but none of you >>replied so far. Question is whether i should rename some of the new interfaces >>and classes to be prefixed by 'Spl'. Also should i drop all constants in SPL >>and instead provide class constants whcih we can do right now? Yes i know >>that might be BC issue but i'd say it is worth the little break and i am >>quite sure we shouldn't do it after 5.1 is out. And Last but not least i'd >>like to MFH two of the new classes if you don#t mind. >> >>marcus >> >>Wednesday, September 14, 2005, 1:20:21 PM, you wrote: >> >> > Any last minute additions to 5.1.0RC2 or can we roll it? -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
