Hello Wez, we could however drop '<%' support and introduce '<?php=' support. Along with that we might even add an E_STRICT to protect against '<?'.
regards marcus Wednesday, August 31, 2005, 7:04:27 PM, you wrote: > But that's not going to happen any time soon (if ever); far too many > scripts use it. > --Wez. > On 8/31/05, John Coggeshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Removing the <?= syntax from PHP 6 entirely right along with <% seems >> like a much better idea to me then trying to expand upon it. >> >> Cheers, >> >> John >> >> On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 15:23 +0200, Ron Korving wrote: >> > Can't help it... ;) By the way, I thought all programmers were lazy to some >> > extent? >> > >> > Seriously though, I think it would be nice and consistent if it would work. >> > I just really like the short <?= syntax. >> > >> > Ron >> > >> > >> > "Joseph Crawford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Why do you find the need to be lazy and use <?=$foo?> lol j/k >> > >> > i always use <?php echo $foo; ?> it may be only a few more chars of code >> > but >> > it is guranteed to work on any php installation ;) >> > >> > -- >> > Joseph Crawford Jr. >> > Codebowl Solutions, Inc. >> > 1-802-671-2021 >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
