Zeev,

On 8/24/05, Michael Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/23/05, Zeev Suraski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >"Real" anonymous functions (as in, closures) should be able to capture
> > >variables from its lexical environment, e.g.:
> >
> > create_function() accepts a string, and that string is constructed with
> > full access to the lexical scope of the creating function, so I'm not
> > exactly sure how it's different.  My ML/LISP memory fails me.

I misread. The obvious difference is that you're not creating code
strings in ML/LISP, so (1) you can avoid all kind of error-prone
marshalling and (2) you can compile the function at compile-time and
simply fill out its free variables when "instantiating" the closure
(using the current lexical environment), giving you syntax checks &
performance.

I intentionally phrased that sentence to resemble object
instantiation: In fact it's pretty much the same thing with more less
verbose/local syntax! I.e. as I believe you said, it is certainly
*not* a question of how/whether we want that functionality, but
whether we want to encourage this particular style of programming.

Cheers,
Michael

--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to