Hi Ilia, While it really doesn't matter to me if functions are namespaced or not, or even if functions are allowed inside namespaces, I just want to clarify that only one hash table lookup would be done (as I said in my previous post, this change was very simple, but all it did was allow the use of colons in function CALLs). The colon would be part of the function name, that's why no performance would be lost.
Regards, Jessie Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: > Why would I need name spaces for basic functions, just so that I need to > rename all my code to use str:replace rather then str_replace and > perform 2 hash table lookups? > > Ilia > > Marco Tabini wrote: >> Hey Ilia, >> >> On 8/12/05 3:03 PM, "Ilia Alshanetsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>-1 to namespaces. As for modifying functions that would require a fair >>>number of function aliases for BC as untold number of scripts will >>>break. That is something we are trying to eliminate in the first place. >>> >> >> >> >> With namespaces, wouldn't the problem go away altogether? Old function >> names can be deprecated and E_STRICT'ed and a new, uniform naming >> convention and parameter order be enforced for the future. I hate >> namespaces but this sounds like a good solution to me. >> >> >> Mt. >> >> >> >> -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
