Hello Andi, you can but that would be different. You somehow have to know then what is there to parse and you couldn't write something like 'phpdoc' that requires correct syntax for both code and comment.
marcus Friday, February 11, 2005, 11:23:40 PM, you wrote: > Can't you use the reflection API to get the data? > At 11:19 PM 2/11/2005 +0100, Marcus Boerger wrote: >>Hello Andi, >> >>Friday, February 11, 2005, 8:51:16 PM, you wrote: >> >> > At 01:33 PM 2/11/2005 -0500, Sean Coates wrote: >> >>Andi Gutmans wrote: >> >>>I think phpDoc is the solution because especially as we start going into >> >>>the web services realm we're going to need to document more complex >> >>>signatures and this kind of syntax won't be sufficient anyway. >> >>>We will need to have a way to document web services so that we can >> >>>auto-generate WSDL files. >> >> >> >>It would be nice to be able to (optionally) parse phpdoc comments with the >> >>reflection API (not only return the docComment, but also parse it into >> >>appropriate pieces), if this is going to be the "official" way to do this. >> >> >> >>Note: I'm not making any demands... just an idea/request. >> >> > Yes, that could be nice. Maybe someone will write an ext/docComment. >> > Shouldn't be too hard. >> >>We'd need a new engine function pointer, one that allows to interpret every >>docComment grabbed from the script :-) >> >> >>-- >>Best regards, >> Marcus mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best regards, Marcus mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
