Wez Furlong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There is no official way to do this kind of thing between arbitrary > extensions. When extensions that are written to share this information, > they typically export an XXX_API function that you can link against to fetch > the data. > > What you've done works, so that's fine, although there is a risk of > crashing if someone passes the wrong type of resource in. If you're > thinking of distributing your extension, we could add a more official > API for you to use, although that doesn't exist in older versions of > the extension, etc. etc.
Thanks, Wez. My extension will likely never be used other than with locally-written code. My biggest concern is making use of the incestual knowledge of the private php_sqlite_db structure and that the database handle is the first field in it. That structure may change in the future. My use of this is as a function used in a query -- sqlite_create_function() is used to allow a call to a php function which passes the database handle to the extension function. Prior to today, my extension had its own private database handle that it initialized on the MINIT function, but I was causing a deadlock by calling this function from within a query in PHP which called the extension which tried to issue additional queries using my private database handle in the extension. Passing in the php-derived handle is the only way of eliminating that deadlock. I wonder whether I'm really alone in wanting access to a database handle for extensions. It would seem appropriate to provide access to the C-level database handle given a PHP resources. That would eliminate the need to base an extenion on insestual knowledge of the database-specific extension. Thanks again, Derrell -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
