Hey Matteo :)
On Fri, Jul 31, 2026, 8:39 PM Matteo Beccati <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Pierre, > > Il 31/07/2026 13:06, Pierre Joye ha scritto: > > beta phases exist exactly for this reason. wider base of testers. > > > > alpha is, heh, this is what we have so far, more or less stable, go test > > it already! > > > > RCs are everything should be stable, that's the final state, last > > stage(s) for any bugs or breaks that didn't get caught earlier. > > > > we should not expect "widely tested" new features, never released before > > per se. > > Yes indeed. But often unexpected side effects and breakages are caught > by various CIs running daily snapshots with OSS projects right, and many use snapshot. and our ci is already very complete tbh. took a while to make it green from a greenfield additions. and yes, that's what beta are for :) > > > between the limited time induced by the updated policies, the Christmas > > break "pls don't", and this, one needs to take holidays to make it > > somehow as the time left in a year is low, very low, now. > > I hear you, it's just that undoing or amending an RFC is a convoluted > process too, especially very late in the release cycle. we are technically still in alpha.... it is not late. It is early in my book ;-)
