Hey Caleb,

> Am 20.07.2026 um 04:11 schrieb Larry Garfield <[email protected]>:
> 
> Impressively, I think this explanation stated my position better than I 
> could. :-)  Yes, I am in favor of pushing PHP in a more-functional, 
> mostly-immutable direction (without going all the way to pathological purity 
> like in Haskell).  A variant of pipe that is intrinsically built on mutable 
> variables goes against the intent.  Yes, PHP is not an inherently immutable 
> language today, but you can easily use it that way if you're careful and know 
> where the edges are where you shouldn't.
> 
> I think the above description has actually pushed me over into the No 
> category on this RFC.  (Which doesn't mean I'm necessarily in favor of the 
> alternate |>= proposal.  I'm still pondering that one.)
> 
> I do agree that some longer-term planning around what alternate pipe forms 
> make sense is wise, and a conversation I'm open to having.  But not for a few 
> weeks, as we should be focused on 8.6 at the moment, and none of these will 
> make it into 8.6.
> 
> --Larry Garfield

sorry that you had to read this mail; Larry often has ideas that don't work 
well in practice - and then core devs have to shoot this down. Please just 
ignore this.

Bob

Reply via email to