Hi all, Primary pushback thus far has not been on the functionality per se but on the directive name itself. The currently-suggested equivalent alternatives are:
``` strict_namespace=1 (RFC as-is) legacy_name_fallback=0 (R. Tommins) global_fallback=0 (T. Düsterhus) disable_root_ns_fallback=1 (A. Rock) ``` Of those, I'd be OK with `global_fallback=0` (though I do still prefer `strict_namespace=1`). Are there any further suggestions or objections on this point? -- pmj
