Hi On 2026-07-13 19:52, Nick Sdot wrote:
Not exactly sure what you would like me to spell me out. It's indeed different things. I made a tiny addition to the non-goals. Let me know if that's enough or if you had something else in mind.
That works for me, thanks. The concern I had was just that “default values for constructor property promotion are special” and thus spelling it out once more that they are special, but that the RFC will not introduce new specialness is a good thing.
Best regards Tim Düsterhus
