Hi
Am 2026-06-29 20:44, schrieb Eric Norris:
I'm afraid of going off-topic, but I disagree that "readonly is
broken." In what way is it broken? A large part of the disagreement in
the previous "readonly hooks" RFC was over the *meaning* of readonly.
I'd have to fully go back to remind myself of the nuance, but my
recollection is that it works exactly how I (and others, per the vote
outcome) expect.
[…]
This is not meant to be a combative email by the way, I just want to
make sure it's clear that I believe readonly is not something that we
should remove or consider baggage.
I'm in full agreement on the quoted sections.
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
