On Tuesday, 23 June 2026 at 00:49, Morgan <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2026-06-23 01:13, Gina P. Banyard wrote: > > > > We still have a bit of time anyone else to propose additional deprecations, > > and if you have write access feel free to add them directly to the RFC. > > > Is spl_object_hash() still useful? The string it creates used to be > quite a bit more complex, but eventually it became equivalent to > > str_pad(dechex(spl_object_id($obj)), 16, '0', STR_PAD_LEFT) . > '0000000000000000' > > I.e., it provides exactly the same content as spl_object_id, but in a > much more obtuse way. For anyone _needing_ that format, the polyfill is > just above. > > > I suppose there might be changes in the future which will make the hash > more useful (parallelism where objects are created simultaneously and > independently), but then it would be spl_object_id() that has trouble > coping. If you provide me with text proposal (ideally in DokuWiki format, but markdown is fine) I'm happy to include it in the bulk RFC. I will however not be writing it myself. Best regards, Gina P. Banyard
