I have added a new section to the RFC explaining the discrepancy about parameter order for the _replace functions. I have also added a new secondary vote to decide this order. Would appreciate it if someone could confirm that this is all OK.
The voting expected to start this Monday has been cancelled and a new discussion/cooldown period has started. Cheers Carlos On Sat, 7 Feb 2026 at 08:39, Ben Ramsey <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2/7/26 01:24, Barel wrote: > > I see that there are different opinions regarding the order of the > > parameters for the _replace functions. Should I add a secondary vote to > > decide this order? If I do, does there need to be a new cooldown period > > before the vote? I am not sure about this, given this is my first RFC, > > would appreciate some clarification on this > > > > Thanks! > > > > Carlos > > > > > "adding, changing or removing any voting widget" is considered a major > change and requires a 14-day cooldown period. If you decide to add a > secondary vote for the parameter order, you'd need to announce the > change here on the list and allow 14 more days for discussion. This > gives everyone enough chance to see the changes and make any comments > before voting begins. > > I would personally be in favor of either changing the proposed parameter > order or adding a secondary vote to decide the order. > > Cheers, > Ben >
