Hi, On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 10:02 AM Edmond Dantes <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello all. > > Today marks two weeks since the RFC was published. > > I need to apply a few minor fixes that Luis pointed out. > > If anyone else is working on comments for the RFC, please let me know. > If there are no objections, we can start the vote on Monday. > > I thought about it and I think we should have this with implementation otherwise the whole thing is kind of pointless because we might not get it merged if some internals disagreement happens. It will be also impossible to get anything bigger than what is proposed now reviewed (read that we won't be likely able to merge the complete implementation in one go). In other words if this passes, it will just means that the API is ok but there is nothing actionable. In addition, I think some people might be even voting against it if there is no implementation that they can review. It means there should be a PR implementing exactly what is in this RFC (minimal stripped version of your current implementation) IMO. Cheers Jakub
