Hi Tim,
On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 at 13:06, Tim Düsterhus <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > Am 2025-10-26 18:09, schrieb David CARLIER: > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/tidyexception-for-tidy > > Thank you for the RFC. I believe moving to Exceptions for error handling > is the right thing, so I support the RFC in principle. > > However the proposal is *very* bare-bones. It would be useful to > describe which errors can currently be emitted from ext/tidy, so that we > can discuss a proper Exception hierarchy. In the PR I'm seeing just 3 > locations - are those all of them? > Yes. > > Naming-wise I wonder if we should go all the way to > `\Tidy\TidyException` (i.e. with a namespace) right away. > I would not mind going as far as to introduce a whole namespace if needs be. RFC updated. > > Best regards > Tim Düsterhus >
